System of assessment of pupils during the college
In most advanced schooling institutions all over the world, they normally use a four-point system for evaluating pupils‘ knowledge, abilities and abilities: „excellent“, „good“, „satisfactory“ and „unsatisfactory“.
Comprehending the meaning of points
The assessment „excellent“ deserves a student who may have discovered comprehensive, systematic and knowledge that is deep the capability to independently perform the tasks given by this program, knowledgeable about the primary and additional literature, suggested by this system. Such an evaluation also involves the mastering for the relationship between your fundamental principles of discipline and their importance for the acquired profession.
The evaluation „good“ sets the pupil who may have mastered the academic and system product in complete, successfully fulfills this program’s tasks, worked out of the main literary works suggested by this system. That is, a student who’s got shown the systematic nature of control knowledge and it is effective at self-replenishment and upgrading in the act of further academic work and activity that is professional.
The grades „satisfactory“ deserve a student that has discovered the data regarding the basic material that is educational the degree needed for further training and future operate in an occupation, with the capacity of performing the tasks given to by the program, knowledgeable about the main literature suggested by this system. This assessment is presented to students who have made flaws in the answer to the exam and in the performance of the exam assignments, but have demonstrated the ability to eliminate them as a rule.
The evaluation is „unsatisfactory“ when it comes to pupil who’s got knowledge of gaps who has led to fundamental errors into the utilization of the tasks given to because of the system, this is certainly, a student that is not able to continue education or start expert activities after graduation without additional learning the appropriate discipline.
Shortcomings of four-point evaluation rating and system system
A system that is four-way assessing pupils‘ knowledge, abilities and abilities calls for significant enhancement or replacement. Its primary disadvantages are: insufficient motivation when it comes to determination of educational and intellectual activity, as it is targeted on acquiring at the least knowledge („made up“ – „did not make up“); made for the reproduction of knowledge and thinking (in sessional conditions, quickly accumulated information quickly „weathered“); subjectivity into the evaluation of pupil’s knowledge; inconsistency using the school system, which pupils used as former students, etc.
The rating system of evaluation, which is based on the accumulation of grades for a certain period of study (module, semester, year, whole term of training) for a comprehensive educational and cognitive activity, is becoming increasingly popular along with the four-point traditional system of evaluation of students‘ knowledge. The sum of the these assessments functions as an indicator that is quantitative of quality of educational and cognitive activity regarding the student in comparison to the successes of his fellow students.
The rating system for evaluating pupils‘ knowledge, skills and abilities is dependant on the following principles:
- each discipline that is academic the pupil’s focus on its mastering is evaluated into the credit units, the actual quantity of that is determined by the rating;
- the record regarding the student’s present work must certanly be kept, which is mirrored when you look at the evaluation that is http://www.myessay.org/ finalin the units of credits);
- the peculiarities of teaching subjects that are differentcomplexity, need for discipline into the curriculum) are considered, that is, the complexity element (importance);
- availability of various kinds of control (outgoing, current, intermediate, final);
The pupil score for the semester or year is described as the arithmetic that is average of score for each discipline.
To make usage of a score system for assessing students‘ knowledge, certain conditions are very important: the readiness of teachers and pupils to perceive them; proper organizational and support that is methodological in particular, independent work of students is obligatory; introduction of modular training; work accounting in the shape of unique tables; application of written verification of real information, etc.